|  
      |  
        
      His life is a palette  
        "Communist” Newspaper, N 222 (14701) 23 of September,1982 | 
   
    |   
        
      I have ingrown my roots 
        in this land    
         “Urartu” 
        newspaper, N 5(60), April 1994 | 
   
    |   
        
      The legend-man    
              
         “Republic of Armenia" 
        newspaper, N 159 (1919) 25 August 1998   | 
   
    | Thesis 
      and antithesis of Valentine Podpomogov     
       “Golos Armenii” N 46 (18401) 29 April 1999 | 
   
    |    His 
        life is a palette  
        From the studio of an artist        
        The doors of his studio are always 
        open, but a question occurs for all the visitors - how do you get in? 
        It’s not that easy – to go in, without catching the 
        planks, leaning precariously against the wall and ready to fall on you 
        any minute, without turning over the buckets, without falling into the 
        hole in the floor, and finally without stepping on the cat, who bears 
        the grand sounding name Serapion. The cat follows your strange actions, 
        yawns, stretches himself and goes into the room. As usual, there are many 
        people inside, and th e 
        host, Valentin Georgievich Podpomogov, is telling one of his endless anecdotes, 
        which seems to be almost unbelievable. The guests' eyes are wet with tears, 
        and from time to time a burst of laughter shakes the walls of the studio. 
        And soon your laughter will be added to this. Podpomogov is an artist, but saying that about him is like saying about 
        an astronaut: “he flies”. Because artists are different, and Podpomogov 
        contrives to be all at once: designer, film art-director, sculptor, architect, 
        and finally, painter. And as surprising as it is, all of these despite 
        the fact that he never obtained any relevant education. Life taught him. 
        He could write a novel named “My universities”, but he prefers the oral 
        tradition, and every listener wants to record his stories on tape.
 Podpomogov was born in Yerevan in 1924 and has lived there most of his 
        life. He is a man, who grew up alongside with Yerevan, and as a real patriot 
        has a right to call the city his. He was the first artist of the city 
        and did a lot for Yerevan becoming the artist that we know and love now. 
        He was the first one who “revived” Armenian animated cartoons – he is 
        the creator of “A drop of honey”, “Parvana”, “The violin in the jungles”. 
        He created these as he says himself – on a “bare table”.
 Now Podpomogov is more famous as a painter; his works are hanged in the 
        Museum of Contemporary Art. One can find out the impressions about his 
        art just looking in the visitors' book there.
 His paintings are really stunning, with the depth of the thoughts enclosed 
        in them and the mastery with which it is delivered. The things happening 
        on in paintings are incredible and sometimes even severe, but they are 
        so convincing, that you think about them not as a possibility but as a 
        reality. By the way – that’s the principle concept of Podpomogov in art.
 If you ask his opinion concerning what art must be like – he will say: 
        “convincing”.
 “Expectation”. Nobody can stay indifferent to this woman, twisting her 
        slender fingers, pulling about the bandages on her hands. She doesn’t 
        have a face. Her expectation is faceless; it is a state, which everyone 
        knows. Faceless image and speaking hands – a paradoxical combination. 
        The painting touches the most innermost, the most concealed fibers of 
        soul in the observer's eyes.
 The same is true not only for “Expectance”. All his paintings are paradoxical 
        and… convincing. It seems that there hasn’t yet been an artist, who co
  uld 
        deliver the horrors of war, the tragedy of a whole nation by painting 
        emptiness. Look at the “Requiem”. An almost empty space, bare earthcovered 
        with wreckage of stones, a sounding emptiness in the broken bell, and 
        only a tiny spark of light shimmering from the doors of a temple. A sinister 
        emptiness. There are not many of his paintings in the halls of museums, but it is 
        possible to tell about each of them for a long time, Podpomogov’s paintings 
        have the ability to stimulate thoughts.
 Podpomogov can’t be called a fruitful artist. There are no canvases leaned 
        on the walls in his studio, no sketches and drafts, covering the floor 
        and the tables. There is one work on the easel, waiting to be finished 
        for a long time. And the author himself is busy making with enthusiasm 
        a palette of incredible construction and is as proud of it as he is with 
        the best of his paintings: “Leonardo didn’t have a palette like this”. 
        And nobody doubts that. And the mess is because the studio is under an 
        endless repair – because the host likes to make everything with his own 
        hands, inventing new constructions of incredible inventiveness.
 -When do you work?
 "Always. I am thinking. It is easy to paint a painting, when I totally 
        imagine it.
 ….And starts making a kind of chair, which nobody ever had."
 
 Zara 
        Maloyan"Communist" Newspaper, N 222 (14701) 23 of September,1982
 | 
   
    |     
      I 
        have ingrown my roots in this land  The 
        Armenian artist Valentin Georgievich Podpomogov will be 70 on 29 of April, 
        1994. A man of amazing destiny, he is very popular not only in the sphere 
        of artistic intellectuals. For many years Podpomogov’s jokes and phrases 
        are on lips of Yerevan. This interview is a kind of vis-à-vis – 
        allowing us to discover for us the famous master of cinema, brush, design, 
        to hear his thoughts about himself and time. - You are constantly turning to Armenian while speaking...
 "My mother is Armenian, and though my father never spoke Armenian, 
        he understood the language very well -- 'I don't want to mar this gorgeous 
        language'" he would say. I am a native of Yerevan and when filling 
        in forms I write – nationality – Russian, mother language – Armenian. 
        I absolutely adore grabar, though do not understand it at all. I could 
        be creating my pictures in America or in Switzerland for example. But 
        that not what I need. I lived and worked in Paris for three months, and 
        though my mastery of painting was the same, something was wrong, perhaps 
        the alien ground under my feet.
 One confession "I have a kind of crystal dream since childhood – 
        to create a series of paintings 'Silver suite'. The idea is - birth of 
        a human, his adolescence, youth, maturity, old age, death and ... birth 
        again."
 "I started to paint to forget the earthly worries about a sunny and 
        warm place under the sun. Of course, I could be working somewhere abroad, 
        but there is one thing I understood: I will create this series of paintings 
        on the land, where I conceived the idea – in my homeland, in Armenia. 
        I have lived here so many years! I’ll see my seventies in April. My culture 
        is Russian, but through the prism of Armenia."
 - You knew the great artists of this world, didn’t you? You were friends 
        with Martiros Sarian, with…
  - I adored Sarian! He invited me to work in his studio, I refused the 
        invitation – “I will not become Sarian, and will loose myself”.
 "I knew very well Kojoyan, Galenc, Hrachia Nersisian, Ervand Kochar… 
        So many unforgettable memories about them, sometimes funny ones. For example 
        I would always speak to Hrachia in Armenian, and he would always reply 
        me in Russian – I don’t know why. Imagine how it looked to people!
 "Or Ervand Kochar visiting me one day – he came directly from the 
        scaffoldings of the monument of Vardan Mamikonyan. I was painting then 
        the picture 'Christ on his knees' (unfortunately it was stolen later). 
        And Kochar, knelt in front of the picture and said 'Gulo jan (that's how 
        he called everyone), do not even think that I knelt because you have created 
        a masterpiece – it's just my feet aching. I can't get up!'"
 "I remember an interesting meeting with Papazian in Odessa, where 
        the film 'Heart of the poet' was being shot. Once, at one in the morning, 
        he knocked at my door (we had neighboring rooms in the hotel). We were 
        drinking cognac instead of tea – they have the same color. One bottle, 
        then the second one!"
 Intuitively I always feel the artificiality - the real and the acting. 
        “I do not envy the kings, I have experienced being one on the stage – 
        confessed Papazyan – there is only one thing that I am envious of – Hrachia’s 
        talent”,- and started to sob. Next day during the shooting he didn’t greet 
        me, and he never did again: he couldn’t forget that he gave himself away 
        in a moment of weakness.
 Paradjanov? He did an honor to me, suggesting to be the art director of 
        his “Color of Pomegranate” film. And what do you think? I said - no: “Serezha, 
        I love you too much to be working for you. You’ll be rude with me - and 
        I hate that. And there won’t be a film in the end”.
 He was an extravagant person, I have never seen anyone of his kind in 
        my life. It was him that I loved truly.
 How can I forget Paruyr Sevak with his thick and kind lips? Did you know, 
        that it was him who translated my name into Armenian - Entaognakanian 
        (literal
  translation 
        of Podpomogov – “sub-helper”). I am not afraid of repeating myself by saying, that everyone must be doing 
        his job well. I am illiterate, I can't make out my handwriting myself. 
        I was expelled from the school, and never studied anywhere else. I became 
        a cartoon maker, because there was nothing else I could do then. But I 
        do not like cartoons, though made them for half a century. My credo is 
        – do everything as best you can. Even if do not do anything.
 I was painting from early childhood, and I owe for that to one person 
        – Henrik Igitian. We both loved Her – the Art of Painting.
 Yes, talent is a heavenly given gift, but you must work hard on yourself 
        as well, self education is a great thing. When I was working on my painting 
        “Mea culpa”, I had to go into thorough study of history of Egypt, culture 
        of ancient Maya. Creating “The Last Supper” would be almost impossible 
        without knowing well the Holy Bible. I am a believer, but not pious person.
 I don't hide that I loved madly – as an addict – the cinema. But if I 
        was to start everything from the start – I would go to the theatre. It 
        is much more interesting, because the painter has to express with very 
        few means the idea, the spirit of the performance. In cinema the technical 
        means prevail, but theatre is more of a creative work. What a wonderful 
        feeling of relaxedness and creative enthusiasm I had when working on stage 
        production born by the genius of Vardan Adjemian and Hrachia Kaplanian.
 -But there is also Podpomogov-sculptor, Podpomogov –designer...Hard to 
        keep up with the multiple expressions of your talent....
 -You are right. This original frame for the painting I made myself (it 
        is the part of the whole idea), the copper fireplace in my house is also 
        made by me. The leather hat on my head is again of my own production. 
        I remember once in post-war Moscow, I had to make a coat for myself... 
        for the first and the last time
  in 
        my life! I am also an applied-designer. Lamps, doors, fireplaces do not take much 
        efforts from me to make. It's lucky that I don't know neither physics 
        nor mathematics, otherwise I would be an aircraft designer too. I say 
        this without boasting. I really created with my own hands a beautifully 
        designed compact film developing device, I’ll show it to you when we are 
        done with the interview – it is under the stairs. I spent a year on it 
        – learnt metal turning. The main engineer of the cinema studio Eprem Roudman 
        died – never having believed that I made it myself.
 -The artist paints in burst of inspiration, people admire his works, perceiving 
        them each in the boundaries of their intellect and spiritual quality. 
        Could you please comment on some of your works.
 -Well, look here. This is “Joker” - I associate the hero of the painting 
        with Gorbachev: he has destroyed everything, not having created anything 
        new. “Curtain” - it expresses in an allegoric way the attitude to art 
        (you see the eyes behind the stage) and to marionettes. Though there isn't 
        any attitude left now.
 “Funeral of faith”, “Expectation” - we always are captives of expectations 
        – from birth till death. And now we live with thoughts – when is all this 
        absurdity going to end. In short, each work has a whole world in it, the 
        mood of the artists, his philosophical vision of existence, his urge toward 
        the perfection of the cosmic spirit. That's what the work “Modern Crucifix” 
        is about.
 
 Interview 
        by Ida Karapetian "Urartu" 
        newspaper, N5(60), April 1994
 | 
   
    | 
      
      The 
        Legend-man     Dear 
        Maestro, I don't know you at all...It was strange, it was unexpected – the artist and his paintings didn't 
        look similar at all, at least from the first sight.
 People crossed the threshold of his studio with reverence. People would 
        go to the artist, expecting to meet a wise, gloomy, taciturn and secluded 
        person, who managed to find some time, a little window for you out of 
        his total business. You could see the amazement on their faces, when a 
        joyful, talkative man would appear in front of them - a master of telling 
        stories, communicative, with a great sense of humor, sometimes even light-minded.
 He had elegant manners. He was an “artist” in the higher sense of the 
        word. It's hard to find someone who wouldn't like him after meeting him. 
        There would be a context felt – “you are interesting and important to 
        me, I don't know you, but you must be a good person. I do not care what 
        you think of me – but I want to do everything for you to feel good”.
 Podpomogov had a unique, rare merit of spiritual generosity. Anyone who 
        has gone into his orbit would be endowed with merits he could only dream 
        about. Women would be declared to be beauties, or at least – interesting 
        women. All the men would become intelligent, brave, and – all as one – 
        “great specialists”. All the artists would turn into talented and genius. 
        And we all felt, perhaps for the first time in our life, that we are really 
        granted with all this merits.
  People 
        would even get overcome with arrogance of their outstanding virtues, but 
        then would be cured as soon as they understood that these are all his, 
        Podpomogov's real virtues and he is endowing with them everybody around 
        him, because he has so many of these, because people are looking at each 
        other as in a mirror – and see what they are themselves. Nevertheless, 
        there were some people, who never got cured of this arrogance... He was not a righteous man, neither a saint, and nothing of human life 
        went past him. He was not an envious person, but couldn’t forget the painful, 
        hopeless childish envy of children, who had toys, normal food and paints. 
        He remembered that, and already an old man was trying to satisfy that 
        childish hunger. Money disappeared as it came – he was buying things in 
        enormous quantities - 5-10 of each- different instruments, strange screwdrivers 
        and drills, saws and pliers. Or several cameras – to be shooting from 
        different angles, and would start to remake, redo them… Bunches of brushes 
        were scattered as firewood all over the studio - “so that I don’t have 
        to wash them”. He could find antique things and start making them move 
        and rotate and slide.
 He h
  ad 
        a passion to make something out of nothing. It was equally interesting 
        for him to create a chair and a painting, and he would spend the same 
        time, efforts and emotions on both. Then this unique chair could just 
        be all stained or broken. The painting could be gifted to some passing 
        acquaintance, though the Maestro knew the price of it quiet well, but 
        could gift it to anyone – depending on his mood. He never kept the sketches and initial 
        drawings, they were lost, disappeared, or sometimes stolen. He thought 
        that there was no sense to keep them, though he was a perfect drawer – 
        and his drawings were no worse than the paintings. If it wasn’t for his 
        wife, Asya, who managed to save and keep all she could, nothing would 
        be left now.
 People – good and not very good ones, clever and not very clever ones, 
        sincere and guileful – were coming to him in an endless flow, as if there 
        was a power attracting them to him.
 Levon Igitian said in an interview: “We owe him one, we didn’t manage, 
        we didn’t think that the time is limited, and we are late now”. It’s not 
        all true. People managed – many managed to give him their love, to give 
        him something, anything, bring joy, though many managed to bring pain, 
        trouble and even treachery.
 It is the society and the government that were late. We lack the tradition 
        to show consideration to people, who are the heroes of national, city 
        mythology. We don’t have the official status of “national wealth”… So, 
        I think, the society will be always late to do something for people like 
        Podpomogov. Their death will always catch people by surprise. And only 
        after that, after feeling the emptiness from their absence, the society 
        will try to give them their due. But they will not need it anymore – so 
        we do it mostly for ourselves.
 And different myths and legends have already woven around Podpomogov, 
        and these we need.
 
 Zara 
        Maloyan, Arts critic  
        “Republic of Armenia" newspaper, N159 (1919) 25 
        August 1998 | 
   
    |   
       
      Thesis 
        and antithesis of Valentine Podpomogov, or Anniversary without Him
  For 
        Podpomogov’s friends, this day, 29th of April, was one of the most bustling, 
        unpredictable and cheery holidays during last 7 decades - to be precise 
        - 74 years. His wife Asya was dropping from tiredness, relatives-helpers were hindering 
        each other in the kitchen, the rizenschnautser Harry, kicked out of the 
        living room because of bad behavior, was barking indignantly.
 Guests were coming in an endless flow. As usual, there were not enough 
        chairs and vases for flowers. Someone was trying to rule over this gathering, 
        someone was playing an instrument, and someone was drinking. Puffs of 
        smoke and din were floating over the table.
 The harsh faces were watching indulgently from the paintings created by 
        Podpomogov. Those who have seen Podpomogov's paintings know the solemnly 
        strict aura, which spreads around them and captures the viewer. The viewer 
        slows down his tempo, becomes silent, stops smiling, the best mood is 
        substituted by sorrow, the way that it does when entering a church – it 
        is a feeling of touching something superior, something that concerns the 
        earthy life only with one side of it, something that is in other space 
        and dimension.
 I always thought that it is impossible to live, eat, smoke, and watch 
        TV beside these paintings, as it’s impossible to live in a temple or in 
        a museum: they are not compatible with everyday routine. Only him, the 
        creator of these, Valentin Podpomogov could reside in this atmosphere 
        without any consequences, reigning over his little kingdom. The time had 
        different pace, space distorted here. His fantasy, which couldn't endure 
        monotony, manifested itself in his studio, in endless alterations and 
        repairs of it.
 He was a subtle artist feeling the deep tragedy of human existence, called 
        Maestro even by close people, holding a strange reconciliation of a mischief-maker 
        and mystifier, ever playing, despite the venerable age and frailties. 
        Decades, given to cinema and theatre were not lost on him – he transformed 
        any space he came in. He built decorations in his dwelling, made staging, 
        where his life was performed as a play.
  I 
        tried to count one day the number of levels in his studio, and counted 
        five of them. "Six, not five" -corrected me Asya, when I expressed 
        sympathy with her: to lay a table she had to go up and down the stairs. 
        "He likes these". And there were motherly notes in the intonation 
        of her speech, which is used to indulge in sprees of her talented child 
        and be proud of him. Stairs, banisters, caged doors, stained-glass hatches, cellar-bar, unfinished 
        fireplace, monograms and emblems on the ceiling – he would be half way 
        through his architectural fantasies when the next ones would capture his 
        thoughts.
 It is not very comfortable to live in a space like this, but he never 
        led an ordinary, normal life. Everything was constantly changing around 
        him, the real essence of things and people was revealing. It felt like 
        falling out of time pace, living in a parallel world, being the real one. 
        In this purely play space nobody could play –you were confronted with 
        yourself and were finding out something unexpected about yourself. A well-bred 
        society member would turn out to be a complete scoundrel, and a person 
        with a fame of bad morality would perform merits peculiar to children 
        and saints. The younger people demonstrated proficiency, the older ones 
        – naivety. Animals behaved like people, but not the opposite...
 That’s who Podpomogov was, reconciling in him the painter and the thinker, 
        the constructor and the workman, the generosity and thrift, gourmandize 
        and asceticism. Any pair of contradictions is mostly possible to find 
        in Podpomogov, as if he is a joint spot of thesis and antithesis. Time, 
        space, people would fall under the influence of his personality, transforming 
        and polarizing. Everything seemed to transform or even become absolutely 
        different.
 This year he would be 75. He didn’t live to see his round date. That's 
        somewhat symbolic – he was not a “round” person – he had the tension of 
        sharp corners in him and eternal strive up to where there is no space 
        and time equals the eternity.
 Zara 
        Ter-Akopian, Art-critic “Golos 
        Armenii” N 46 (18401) 29 April 1999 | 
   
    |   
        Translated by Hehine Koshtoyan   |